Phase 1 · Probability calibration · May initialization · JJAS and its months

Phase 1 · May initialization · JJAS and its months

Confirmed better than the incumbent climatology blend for the published tercile probabilities (RPS): none. ✓ = better than the incumbent with Holm-adjusted p < 0.05 across every method and target (SEL: across the targets) and not worse over 2017–2025. This is the benchmark’s own decision, as run (Holm); the method selection applies Benjamini–Hochberg to the same p-values (since 17 October 2026). Amount correction fixed: MVS. National aggregate (All Ethiopia). Run at commit 0849f44.

Tercile skill

Tercile RPSS, outer leave-one-year-out 1993–2016 (bold: incumbent)
MethodJulJunAugSepJJAS
Climatology blend (incumbent)+0.014-0.000+0.012+0.003+0.027
Pseudocount smoothing (no blend)-0.029-0.113-0.031-0.064-0.017
Temperature scaling+0.014-0.001+0.012+0.006+0.027
Regularized Dirichlet calibration+0.008-0.007+0.009+0.001+0.024
Regularized multinomial logistic regression+0.004-0.008+0.008-0.003+0.021
Ordinal (cumulative-logit) logistic regression+0.004-0.008+0.007-0.003+0.020
SEL (method chosen each year by inner cross-validation)+0.009-0.001+0.011+0.006+0.025
Tercile RPSS, fit 1993–2016, scored 2017–2025 (exploratory)
MethodJulJunAugSepJJAS
Climatology blend (incumbent)+0.042+0.010+0.041+0.008+0.039
Pseudocount smoothing (no blend)+0.022-0.056+0.066-0.041+0.003
Temperature scaling+0.034+0.009+0.042+0.009+0.037
Regularized Dirichlet calibration+0.042+0.012+0.040+0.010+0.035
Regularized multinomial logistic regression+0.040+0.016+0.037+0.005+0.028
Ordinal (cumulative-logit) logistic regression+0.040+0.016+0.038+0.005+0.029
SEL (method chosen each year by inner cross-validation)+0.042+0.009+0.042+0.009+0.039

Log loss and Brier skill

Log-loss skill against climatology, 1993–2016
MethodJulJunAugSepJJAS
Climatology blend (incumbent)+0.011+0.001+0.009+0.004+0.019
Pseudocount smoothing (no blend)-0.053-0.171-0.058-0.074-0.041
Temperature scaling+0.010-0.004+0.008+0.005+0.018
Regularized Dirichlet calibration+0.005-0.004+0.007+0.002+0.015
Regularized multinomial logistic regression+0.002-0.006+0.005-0.002+0.012
Ordinal (cumulative-logit) logistic regression+0.002-0.005+0.004-0.002+0.012
SEL (method chosen each year by inner cross-validation)+0.007-0.004+0.007+0.005+0.018
Brier skill, below normal, 1993–2016
MethodJulJunAugSepJJAS
Climatology blend (incumbent)+0.015+0.001+0.016+0.005+0.034
Pseudocount smoothing (no blend)-0.035-0.111-0.027-0.066-0.003
Temperature scaling+0.015-0.001+0.016+0.007+0.032
Regularized Dirichlet calibration+0.007-0.003+0.013+0.002+0.031
Regularized multinomial logistic regression+0.001-0.004+0.013-0.003+0.027
Ordinal (cumulative-logit) logistic regression+0.002-0.005+0.011-0.003+0.026
SEL (method chosen each year by inner cross-validation)+0.011-0.001+0.015+0.007+0.033
Brier skill, above normal, 1993–2016
MethodJulJunAugSepJJAS
Climatology blend (incumbent)+0.014-0.002+0.008+0.001+0.019
Pseudocount smoothing (no blend)-0.023-0.114-0.035-0.062-0.030
Temperature scaling+0.014-0.001+0.009+0.005+0.021
Regularized Dirichlet calibration+0.010-0.011+0.005+0.000+0.017
Regularized multinomial logistic regression+0.006-0.012+0.003-0.003+0.014
Ordinal (cumulative-logit) logistic regression+0.005-0.011+0.003-0.003+0.014
SEL (method chosen each year by inner cross-validation)+0.008-0.001+0.007+0.005+0.018

Tests

Each method against the incumbent (negative Δ favours the method)
MethodTargetΔ RPS 1993–2016Years betterHolm pΔ RPS 2017–2025Years betterConfirmed
Pseudocount smoothing (no blend)Jul+0.019710/241.0000+0.00935/9no
Pseudocount smoothing (no blend)Jun+0.05085/241.0000+0.03104/9no
Pseudocount smoothing (no blend)Aug+0.019410/241.0000-0.01155/9no
Pseudocount smoothing (no blend)Sep+0.03035/241.0000+0.02293/9no
Pseudocount smoothing (no blend)JJAS+0.01977/241.0000+0.01685/9no
Temperature scalingJul+0.00019/241.0000+0.00384/9no
Temperature scalingJun+0.00029/241.0000+0.00046/9no
Temperature scalingAug-0.000212/241.0000-0.00045/9no
Temperature scalingSep-0.001314/241.0000-0.00016/9no
Temperature scalingJJAS+0.000112/241.0000+0.00134/9no
Regularized Dirichlet calibrationJul+0.002711/241.0000+0.00004/9no
Regularized Dirichlet calibrationJun+0.002910/241.0000-0.00064/9no
Regularized Dirichlet calibrationAug+0.00129/241.0000+0.00064/9no
Regularized Dirichlet calibrationSep+0.000911/241.0000-0.00074/9no
Regularized Dirichlet calibrationJJAS+0.001410/241.0000+0.00193/9no
Regularized multinomial logistic regressionJul+0.00496/241.0000+0.00094/9no
Regularized multinomial logistic regressionJun+0.00369/241.0000-0.00267/9no
Regularized multinomial logistic regressionAug+0.00188/241.0000+0.00184/9no
Regularized multinomial logistic regressionSep+0.002811/241.0000+0.00134/9no
Regularized multinomial logistic regressionJJAS+0.00289/241.0000+0.00532/9no
Ordinal (cumulative-logit) logistic regressionJul+0.00496/241.0000+0.00094/9no
Ordinal (cumulative-logit) logistic regressionJun+0.00358/241.0000-0.00277/9no
Ordinal (cumulative-logit) logistic regressionAug+0.00218/241.0000+0.00132/9no
Ordinal (cumulative-logit) logistic regressionSep+0.002812/241.0000+0.00174/9no
Ordinal (cumulative-logit) logistic regressionJJAS+0.00309/241.0000+0.00492/9no
SELJul+0.00234/241.0000 (targets)+0.00000/9no
SELJun+0.00029/241.0000 (targets)+0.00046/9no
SELAug+0.000510/241.0000 (targets)-0.00045/9no
SELSep-0.001314/240.2391 (targets)-0.00016/9no
SELJJAS+0.000610/241.0000 (targets)+0.00000/9no

Fitted parameters and the selection

Fitted parameters (fit on 1993–2016) and the selection-aware choices
TargetBlend weight λTemperature TOrdinal cutpointsOrdinal slopes (mean, log spread)SEL choices (1993–2016 folds)Fallbacks
Jul0.613.85-0.63, +0.67+0.46, -0.13Temperature scaling 15, Climatology blend (incumbent) 90
Jun0.824.00-0.63, +0.63+0.33, +0.04Temperature scaling 240
Aug0.734.00-0.63, +0.67+0.40, -0.14Temperature scaling 22, Climatology blend (incumbent) 20
Sep0.774.00-0.64, +0.64+0.19, +0.07Temperature scaling 240
JJAS0.613.36-0.64, +0.65+0.47, +0.05Temperature scaling 22, Climatology blend (incumbent) 20

Figures

RPSS and log-loss skill by method and target.
RPSS and log-loss skill by method and target.
Reliability of each method for the season (below and above normal).
Reliability of each method for the season (below and above normal).

← SummaryPhase 2 →